Goal: Determine the relationship between the instructional model used in middle school (separate reading and English or integrated language arts block) and the overall success/preparedness for high school reading and writing skills. Determine how teacher collaboration skills/habits on middle school campuses affects student success.
Action Step(s) Person(s) Responsible Time Line: Start/End Needed Resources Evaluation
1. Conduct brief review of available literature. Myself, Kristin Hebert (secondary ELA/R coordinator) March 2011-April 2011 EBSCO, professional journals, NCTE resources Is literature on the subject available? What has worked/not worked in other districts? What structure do the majority of Texas middle schools use?
2. Conduct review of TAKS data for feeder cohorts between years 2006-2011, 2005-2010, 2004-2009, and 2003-2008 from CHS and WHS feeder middle schools Myself, site supervisor, Dr. Mike Waldrip (asst superintendent for data analysis), and Cindy Parry (technology/Aware resource) March 2011-May 2011 Aware, data resources from both high schools, technological know-how from Dr. Waldrip and Ms. Parry What patterns emerge, especially in written portions of tests? Do subpops perform at different levels based on schedule? What other factors are at play?
3. Design and administer freshmen student surveys. Interview high school English I teachers. (Can I ask HS teachers to give overall picture of grades earned by these students?) Myself, English I teachers, permission of HS principals April 2011-May 2011 Surveys to examine for possible questions, time to collaborate with HS teachers, 10-15 minutes of classtime to administer survey, several hours of intern time to disaggregate and compile survey results. Create excel spreadsheet that groups survey results and teacher-provided info by feeder. Analyze results – do patterns appear? What other factors may be at play? Compile list of overall reactions and emerging thoughts.
4. Interview MS teachers to ascertain collaborative structures and habits between Reading and English teachers on separate schedules. Myself, MS teachers (volunteers), K. Hebert, Michele Risoli, permission of MS principals August 2012-October 2012 30-minute block of time during collaborative planning period of separate teams. How do teachers feel about overall effectiveness of their schedule? Have any taught on an ILA block? How would they compare effectiveness? What collaborative structures seem to produce results – in teacher perspective? In student achievement data?
5. Implement collaborative planning structures (possibly online) where none exist MS teachers (volunteers), K. Hebert, Michele Risoli, permission of MS principals November 2012 Time for planning to occur; possibly Moodle or other online source What collaborative structures seem to produce results – in teacher perspective? In student achievement data?
6. Collect writing samples from beginning and mid-year students, graded on the 6-traits rubric by English I teachers. Volunteer English I teachers, myself, HS principal permission August 2011 and January 2012. Similar writing assignments for English I classes at both HSs. Cooperation of English I teachers. Time to photocopy or collect written responses. Does writing improve more in the freshman year for one group over the other? Is writing stronger at the start of the year for one group over the other?
No comments:
Post a Comment